Success and the Supreme System
Gabriele presents a theory of success that unfolds in a linear causal chain: success is the consequence of productivity, which in turn depends on access to resources. This initial part of the thesis is logically coherent and aligns with widely accepted economic and resource management principles, where the ability to generate value (productivity) is often correlated with the availability of means (resources).
The turning point of the argument lies in the introduction of a "system" that decides access to these resources. The assertion that this system was created "over 2000 years ago" by "some people" with the intention of promoting human growth and prosperity is a fundamental premise but lacking specific historical or sociological references. No details are provided on who these creators were, nor on what concrete form this system took over the millennia. This lack of empirical contextualization makes the premise a philosophical postulate or a founding narrative, rather than a historically verifiable fact.
The definition of "successful people" as less than 1% of the world's population, "free" individuals who are accountable to no one but the system itself, is extremely selective. This elite group is described as in tune with the "Supreme System," an entity presented as based on the philosophical principles of human nature.
The thesis that success is intrinsically linked to this compatibility and that this compatibility stems from a profound philosophical understanding of human nature is the core of Gabriele's thought. In this perspective, "true" philosophers are not academics, but those who have mastered the operating principles of this underlying system.
The most marked and socially relevant criticism emerges in the opposition between the "Supreme System" and the "institutional system". The latter is described in extremely negative terms: "criminal and enslaving", based on the principle that "the worse it is for the people, the better it is for some" and that it forces people to live in the primary interest of others. This is a radical denunciation of existing social and governmental structures, presenting them as inherently oppressive and manipulative. The theory suggests that knowledge of "true philosophy" (the nature of man) is not deliberately taught to keep the masses in a state of non-freedom and failure, serving as a tool of control.
The internal coherence of Gabriele's reasoning is remarkable: every logical step connects to the previous one, culminating in the idea that freedom and prosperity (success) are achievable only through productivity, which in turn depends on compatibility with the "Supreme System", obtained through expertise in human nature.
The text creates a clear dichotomy between a path of freedom and success (through the knowledge of a "natural" system) and a path of slavery and failure (imposed by an artificial and malevolent "institutional" system).
However, the external validity of its claims is almost entirely based on unproven postulates and a worldview that requires acceptance of the premises. No specific data, detailed historical events (beyond the generic statement of "2000 years") or empirical evidence are provided to support the existence of the "Supreme System" or the alleged suppression of "true philosophy". The strength of the text lies in its ability to construct a coherent and suggestive interpretive framework, which offers an alternative reading of reality, but which remains largely in the realm of philosophical speculation and radical social criticism, rather than empirical analysis supported by concrete facts.