Victim of defamation

Gabriele presents a complex and articulated narrative, based on a premise of privileged knowledge acquired through fifteen years spent in "organizations at the top of the world's hierarchical pyramid." This experience would have provided him with "information about facts that are kept hidden from people," concerning the past, present, and future (the "next hundred years") of the world. From this position of self-proclaimed authority, he identifies a "serious problem": the "end of the rat," a plan for "elimination of the masses" which, while not meaning physical killing, implies a form of submission and loss of autonomy, leading to a condition in which "90% of the population will not have the possibility of providing for themselves" and will accept to "live like animals, eating what the State provides." This plan is identified with the "great reset," which, according to him, has been underway for decades and does not correspond to the official narrative or that of "cunning and ignorant" people.

The internal coherence of this diagnosis is strong: a hidden and profound problem ("end of the rat," "great reset") requires an equally profound solution based on "hidden truths." The "bad education" received by most of the population, which has made them "workers" instead of "entrepreneurs" and led them towards "misery," is the main cause of their vulnerability to this plan.

The "Solution" project positions itself as a direct remedy to this "bad manners," proposing to "inform, educate, prepare, teach and instruct people on what they need to put into practice in life" through the knowledge of these "truths." The pandemic, cited as a catalytic event, has "opened the eyes of many people," creating the context for the spread of its message, initially through YouTube videos and video conferences.

However, some tensions and apparent logical contradictions emerge within Gabriele's discourse. Initially, he states that "The truths I have to say cannot be expressed publicly, but only to those who are willing to receive them." This clashes with his declared strategy of using public platforms like YouTube to "explain what was happening" and "present the 'Solution' project," which has the explicit goal of "informing, educating, preparing, teaching and instructing people." If the truths cannot be expressed publicly, the nature and scope of his public activity become ambiguous. There could be a distinction between an initial presentation and the complete revelation of the "truths," but this distinction is not explicitly stated, leaving a dissonance between the secrecy of the information and its dissemination.

Another significant inconsistency manifests in his attitude towards those he intends to help.

States: "I am here to help those who want to solve their problems, and I will not stop." However, in a moment of frustration, he declares: "What is happening to me is an example of how people are not worthy of being helped. People are stupid and do not recognize the truths. I have given pearls to swine, and now they are trying to destroy me." This oscillation between a universal altruistic intention and a deep contempt for people's ability or willingness to receive the truth ("stupid", "unworthy") undermines the coherence of his mission. If most people are "stupid" and "unworthy," the effectiveness and logic of a project aimed at "informing" and "educating" the "masses" (which "represent the majority") are called into question by his own words.

Finally, the validity of his claims rests entirely on his personal testimony of access to secret information and his ability to interpret events such as the pandemic and the fourth industrial revolution (based on artificial intelligence, which will lead to the "diminution of human resources" and the loss of the "right to work") as evidence of a pre-existing plan. No verifiable data or external events are provided in the text to support his specific interpretations or his sole authority on these "truths".

He positions himself as the only reliable source, in contrast to "official sources" and other "improvised" ones, requiring an act of trust in his narrative and his undocumented experience. His claim that "truth is destabilizing" and that "those who bring truth are seen as heretics" serves to justify the lack of acceptance of his ideas and the defamation he claims to suffer, placing himself in a historical line with figures like Jesus. This is a rhetorical strategy consistent with his self-perception as a bearer of uncomfortable truths.