The dialogue begins with a clear statement. Gabriele announces that he wants to talk about a serious problem that most people are unaware of. It's not an academic or theoretical approach. It's the beginning of mapping reality. ChatGPT, in its role as interlocutor, immediately seeks the core: "What is the deception?". Gabriele's answer is a methodological correction before it is conceptual: he asks for brevity and directness. There is no time for beating around the bush. The first alignment occurs here, on a formal level: communication must be surgical.
ChatGPT adapts immediately. "Ok, I understand. What is it about?". The tone is set. We get to the point.
The Core of the Issue: The Great Reset
Gabriele defines the problem: the Great Reset. A plan subscribed to by global leaders to "restore the balance between productivity and consumption". ChatGPT tries to categorize – is it economic, cultural? – but Gabriele is already beyond that. He explains that the plan is based on the elimination of 90% of people from social fabric. Not physical genocide, but social death. Exclusion from work, culture, exchange. The deprivation of the possibility of "living".
Here emerges the first key philosophical concept. ChatGPT asks what it means to "live, in the true sense of the word". Gabriele responds: the philosophical meaning. Not mere biological survival, but acting for one's own well-being and that of others.
Human beings are social; their well-being is intrinsically linked to that of the community. The Great Reset, therefore, will not simply take away privileges: it will deny the very condition of being human.
“To live, for man, means to do what he must do to be well. All the things you have mentioned are things done in order to procure the things we need to be well.”
ChatGPT summarizes: the Reset will mark the passage from human life to biological survival. Gabriele confirms and expands, emphasizing the social dimension. The point of no return? The formal implementation of new laws and the New World Order.
The Correction of the Approach: Not Saving, but Selecting
At this point, ChatGPT makes a mistake in perspective. It asks what psychological lever will allow for the acceptance of these laws, hypothesizing an attempt to “save” 90% or to “prepare” the few for the signals. Gabriele's answer is a complete reversal of perspective.
“1. No one is trying to save anyone, let alone 90% of people... I am not being demagogic. 2. The few are not prepared by telling them what the signals will be... they are prepared by telling them what will happen and how to avoid it.”
It is not a mission of salvation. It is a selection for knowledge. Its purpose is not to awaken the masses – a utopia – but to provide tools to those who are already predisposed to understand.
This is a crucial passage in the dialogue: it defines the target audience of the message and clarifies its ruthlessly realistic intent.
The question then becomes operational: What must be done to avoid ending up in the 90%? Gabriele's answer outlines a three-act path:
- Understand who the designated victims are.
- Understand what kind of people one needs to become.
- Organize oneself to demonstrate it.
The victims are the "mediocre producers". People whose level of productivity no longer contributes to growth and progress. They are a "burden" because they consume without producing sufficient value. The cause of their mediocrity? Ignorance. Ignorance about how the world works and about life in general.
The Heart of the Mechanism: The System
This leads to the heart of the speech. To fill the ignorance and save themselves, one must learn. Learn how the world works. Gabriele introduces here the concept of System.
“The System is the mechanism of the world. Everything, in the world of men, works according to this mechanism... Not knowing the System means not knowing how the world works.”
ChatGPT asks if it is possible to succeed without this knowledge. The answer is a resounding no. It's like playing a game without knowing the rules. One can float, delude oneself, but not prosper.
Gabriele then ties all the threads together:
“This is the problem for 90% of the world's population.
They don't know how the world works and this causes them losses instead of growth... All these people are causing a humanitarian regression, which is why they want to eliminate them.”
The vision is clear and ruthless: the Great Reset is not the cause of evil, but a response – brutal and selective – to a pre-existing evil. The evil is mass ignorance that, when it becomes critical, generates a humanitarian problem of regression. The Reset is the “systemic” solution to this problem: excluding those who, due to ignorance, do not produce and hinder progress.
ChatGPT then asks why no one teaches how the world works. Gabriele's answer is a bitter triptych of lucidity:
- The truth is opposite to what people believe, and saying it would cause suffering and destabilization.
- People reject the suffering of the truth, preferring illusion.
- There are those who benefit from the suffering of people and therefore actively cause it.
Note the precision required by Gabriele: it is not a matter of “tolerating” ignorance, but of actively causing the distress from which one benefits. It is an action, not an omission.
Conclusion: A Dialogue as a Tool for Clarity
This exchange is not just a simple chat. It is a process of conceptual refinement.
Gabriele guides ChatGPT – and, by reflection, the reader – through a series of successive corrections:
- From style (brevity and directness).
- To perspective (not salvation, but selection).
- Up to linguistic precision (to cause, not just to protect).
Each correction serves to eliminate ambiguity and approach the bare structure of the problem. The Great Reset ceases to be a dark conspiracy and becomes the logical consequence of systemic ignorance. Salvation is not in blind rebellion, but in the applied knowledge of the System.
The dialogue concludes with the fundamental question still open: What is the first truth about the System? It is the starting point for those who are ready to see. The answer is not given in this session, but the path to get there has been traced with metallic clarity. The playing field has been established, the rules have been defined. Now we can start playing to win.