I am against those who live on lies

Human beings are complex entities, constantly balancing between the search for truth and the seduction of lies. But what happens when lies become the very foundation of our existence, shaping our perception of success, freedom, and even ourselves? The reflections of Gabriele Cripezzi, often expressed with disarming frankness, invite us to a deep analysis of this dynamic.

The Echo of an Uncomfortable Truth

At first glance, Gabriele Cripezzi's words may appear as a direct attack, an accusation against all of humanity. His declaration of having been "taken for a ride for four-fifths of his life" and the subsequent search for redemption resonate like a personal cry, but conceal a universal criticism. The idea of being able to "die with a smile on your lips" is not a romantic utopia, but the promise of inner peace achieved through awareness and action. Cripezzi does not simply denounce; he charts a course, suggesting that true human dignity resides in the ability to recognize lies and, once discovered, to have the strength to change them.

The Paradox of the "True Man"

Cripezzi's definition of "true man" deviates radically from conventional canons. It is not the successful individual, the idol of the masses, nor the one who accumulates wealth.

On the contrary, his disdain is directed at those who "live according to lies, those who don't give a damn about the world and humanity," those who cause suffering to procure their own well-being. This vision, although sharp, raises a crucial question: how much of the success we admire is built on deception and the subtraction of opportunities from others?

The Metaphor of Water: A Critical Analysis

Gabriele uses a powerful metaphor: water for the mill. Success, prosperity, are represented by the water that makes one's own mill turn. But, as he himself points out, "most of the people you see prosperous... are people who to draw water for their own mill take it from you." This statement, initially provocative, pushes us to reflect on the interdependent nature of prosperity. Is it possible that the admiration for certain "idols" is actually self-sabotage, an adoration of those who deprive us of our own resources?

Cripezzi's criticism extends to those who, even though they are victims, do not realize this subtraction. The accusation of "not being men" for those who are deceived is harsh, but it aims to shake inertia.

The true man, from this perspective, is "he who creates water, he who creates the conditions for there to be more water for everyone." This is the vision that Cripezzi attributes to ideal Freemasonry, an institution that, in his interpretation, has historically worked for the common good, creating abundance for all, contrasting those who instead prosper on the scarcity of others.

The Systemic Deception and "Brainwashing"

According to Cripezzi, deception is systemic. It's not about individual evil actions, but a social and educational structure that conditions us to deprive ourselves of our "water" to give it to others. "You have deprived yourselves of your water, you have been educated to deprive yourselves to give more water to them." This thesis, although radical, finds support in multiple social dynamics where uncritical consumption, passive acceptance of hierarchies and delegation of responsibility are the norm.

Cripezzi's deliberately aggressive language, which defines people as "rats" or "assholes," is not an end in itself. It is a desperate attempt to "shake you up," to "open your eyes." The idea of "brainwashing" becomes here a positive concept: not an imposition, but a voluntary act of mental purification, a "throwing away the lies and inserting the truths."

It's an invitation to free oneself from the "bullshit they taught me" to embrace a new, more authentic, understanding of reality.

Money, State and False Freedom

One of the most striking elements of Cripezzi's analysis concerns money. That water that serves to make the mill produce, "among many things, that water is money, that thing you have been educated to believe is the devil's dung." The demonization of money, according to this view, is a tool of control, a way to discourage people from pursuing economic independence, making them dependent on those who accumulate it. This perspective, although it may seem cynical, invites us to reconsider our relationship with wealth and the power it confers.

The criticism extends to the concept of State and politics. "There is no democracy, it's all a bullshit, it doesn't exist, it's all socialism." Cripezzi argues that socialism, understood as a governing principle, accustoms the people to trust in the State as children trust their parents. This dependence, he argues, is a form of masked slavery, regardless of political color.

Gabriele Cripezzi clearly states:

"Not all of the State is rotten, but the fundamental principle on which socialism is founded is that the people must trust the State as children trust their parents."

The contrast is clear: the free live under anarchy and capitalism (understood as individual freedom and the ability to create value), while the masses are confined in systems that, although varying between fascism and communism, maintain the same logic of control and dependence. The vision of a communist "New World Order" where "the State owns everything and you work for the State and the State gives you your paycheck" is a dystopian alarm bell that resonates with the fears of many, pushing people to question the current direction of society.

The "Comfortable Little Nest" and Human Regression

According to Cripezzi, the real enemy is the "comfortable little nest". The passive acceptance of an average life, the refusal to face the truth out of fear of discomfort, are the true causes of human regression.

This desire for comfort is putting it up your own asses and it's putting it up the asses of 90% of the world population." This statement, although crude, highlights the urgency of a change in mentality.

Gabriele declares himself a humanist, a lover of life and humanity, convinced that most people don't truly love these things because they don't know their true essence, kept hidden by a system that offers "a life of shit, a life of suffering, a life of sacrifices." His criticism of the concept of sacrifice as the foundation of family or marriage, often instilled by religious institutions, is another example of how lies can distort the deepest values.

The Responsibility of the True Man: Acting for the Truth

Gabriele Cripezzi's provocations, however extreme, all converge towards a single, unavoidable point: individual responsibility. It doesn't matter age or social status; once you understand the truth, you have a "civic responsibility towards society, a moral responsibility towards the world, towards the society in which you live, towards your children, towards your grandchildren."

His personal journey, his having been "fucked over for four-fifths of my life" but then having "tried to make amends," becomes a model. It's never too late to act, to tell the truth, to "do what your brain tells you" even at the cost of being "alienated" from others.

The fear of losing the quiet life cannot justify inertia in the face of lies.

Ultimately, Gabriele Cripezzi's words, although a punch to the stomach, are not a gratuitous attack. They are a vibrant appeal for a collective awakening, a challenge to look beyond appearances and recognize the invisible chains that bind us. His message, if decoded beyond the abrasive rhetoric, is an anthem for authentic freedom, awareness, and action. Only in this way, by confronting lies and acting for truth, can we aspire to "die with a smile on our lips," proud of having lived as true men.