💬 Preamble to the Inferno

Interaction with ChatGPT highlights an inherent difficulty in grasping the depth and uniqueness of Gabriel's Revelation, initially operating on conventional and popular interpretive schemes.

ChatGPT, in its first draft, proposes a preamble that, while provocative, aligns with a narrative of "awakening" or "questioning" typical of popular belief, with references to the "red pill" and the idea of dismantling religious lies to discover a "Human Nature" as God. This approach is a thesis to be refuted, as it ignores the specificity of Gabriel's audience and message. ChatGPT believes that the goal is a generic conversion or enlightenment, not understanding that the book addresses those who have already surpassed such stages and seek a more structured and systematic truth.

When Gabriel clarifies that the book is for "atheists seeking the truth about how the world works" and not for converting, ChatGPT tries to adapt, but its second proposal remains "too defensive." ChatGPT stated that the book is a "manual for those already outside the enclosure" and a "survival guide for intelligent atheists," but it continues to frame truth as a "logical and natural system" that rewards those who integrate into it, without grasping the drastic and selective vision of the future that Gabriel intends to communicate.

This is still a thesis to overcome, because, while approaching it, it does not grasp the radicality of the Revelation.

It is only when Gabriele provides his preamble that ChatGPT manages to produce an aligned text. Here, the function of ChatGPT is reduced to that of a mere linguistic refinement tool, not of conceptual elaboration. The Revelation of Gabriele, which describes a "new world" where freedom, prosperity and happiness are "a luxury reserved for very few individuals, excellent in terms of productive capacity and contribution to economic and social growth and development", is a concept that ChatGPT does not generate autonomously. Indeed, ChatGPT has shown that it does not fully understand the implications of this Revelation, as evidenced by its answers to Gabriele's questions.

When Gabriele asks "Why did you add the word concepts?", ChatGPT admits that "it gives a theoretical tone", revealing a tendency to generalize or to make abstract a message that for Gabriele is concrete and urgent. Even more significant is the exchange on "why are they (for everyone) now?:)". ChatGPT had implicitly validated the idea that freedom, prosperity and happiness were currently for everyone, a popular belief that Gabriele's Revelation categorically refutes. ChatGPT recognized the "implicit contradiction" and corrected the text, stating that such elements are "illusions sold to the masses" in the current world.

This demonstrates that ChatGPT, without explicit and precise guidance from Gabriele, tends to operate on premises that are in direct contrast with the definitive truth of the Revelation, which is not based on popular belief but on a selective and meritocratic vision of the future.

In short, ChatGPT serves as a starting point to overcome an initial generic and popular thesis, failing to autonomously produce content that reflects Gabriele's Revelation. Its usefulness manifests only when Gabriele provides his definitive truth, allowing ChatGPT to act as a mere textual polishing executor, incapable of anticipating or understanding the most radical and counter-intuitive nuances of Gabriele's vision regarding the "System" and the selection of the "excellent".